Member Login
Select Page

Policy Debate

Policy Debate

Policy Debate

CX  or POL • High School Main Event • Middle School Main Event • Also known as Cross-Examination Debate

Policy Debate (CX) is a two-on-two debate where the affirmative team proposes a policy plan and the negative team argues against its adoption. The topic provided by the National Federation of State High School Associations and published on the NSDA website remains the same throughout the academic year, allowing students to explore a single issue in depth. Each student delivers two speeches: one constructive and one rebuttal. Internet access is permitted unless otherwise specified by the tournament.

Policy Debate

This event appeals to students who enjoy working as part of a team and analyzing complex issues. Policy debaters dive deep into research, constructing nuanced cases and anticipating intricate arguments. The format is known for being the most technical of the debate events, often involving rapid delivery and detailed evidence.

Successful Policy debaters are collaborative, curious, focused, and highly analytical. They excel at synthesizing research, thinking critically, and staying composed during fast-paced exchanges.

Time Limits

Speech Abbreviation Time Limit
1st Affirmative Constructive 1AC 8 minutes
Negative Cross-Examination of Affirmative 3 minutes
1st Negative Constructive 1NC 8 minutes
Affirmative Cross-Examination of Negative 3 minutes
2nd Affirmative Constructive 2AC 8 minutes
Negative Cross-Examination of Affirmative 3 minutes
2nd Negative Constructive 2NC 8 minutes
Affirmative Cross-Examination of Negative 3 minutes
1st Negative Rebuttal 1NR 5 minutes
1st Affirmative Rebuttal 1AR 5 minutes
2nd Negative Rebuttal 2NR 5 minutes
2nd Affirmative Rebuttal 2AR 5 minutes
Prep Time (each team) 8 minutes
Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase fiscal redistribution in the United States by adopting a federal jobs guarantee, expanding Social Security, and/or providing a basic income.

Documents

2023

Rebuttal Basics in Debate

2024

Videos

2023

Policy Debate Middle School Final Round Video Archive
National Tournament Awards Assembly Video Archive
HS Policy Debate Final Round Videos
MS Policy Debate Final Round Videos

2024

HS Policy Debate Final Round Videos
MS Policy Debate Final Round Videos

Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its security cooperation with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in one or more of the following areas: artificial intelligence, biotechnology, cybersecurity.

Documents

2022
2023

Videos

2022

HS Policy Debate Final Round Videos
MS Policy Debate Final Round Videos

2023

HS Policy Debate Final Round Videos
MS Policy Debate Final Round Videos

Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its protection of water resources in the United States.

Files

2021

Policy Starter Files – 2021-2022

2022

 

Documents

2021

Start Here: Teaching Policy

2022

Videos

2021

HS Policy Debate Final Round Videos
MS Policy Debate Final Round Videos

2022

HS Policy Debate Final Round Videos
MS Policy Debate Final Round Videos

Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its non-military exploration and/or development of the Earth’s oceans.

Files

2014

Policy Files Archive – 2014-2015

2015

Policy Files Archive – 2014-2015

Documents

2014

 

2015

Videos

2014

HS Policy Debate Final Round Videos
MS Policy Debate Final Round Videos

2015

HS Policy Debate Final Round Videos
MS Policy Debate Final Round Videos

Policy Debate provided me immeasurable critical thinking skills and confidence in not only my ability to speak but also my ability to think. But what I loved most about Policy Debate is that the nature of the activity is one that rewards hard work—nobody is born a good debater. Instead Policy Debate is pure effort and perseverance and I love that.
Nathaniel Sawyer

NSDA Alum